A few
months ago I put a sermon suggestion box in the narthex. One person suggested
that I answer this question in a sermon. “Is marriage a better choice than
moving in together? And why?”
As I
thought about the question, I realized that I had to address a more basic
issue, first. So while I’ll get back to which is better—marriage or living
together—before the end of this blog entry, I want to start with that more basic
issue. What is the valuable, precious thing that we shoot for when we enter
into a couple relationship?
That
precious thing is “attachment.”
“Attachment”
isn’t a word you find in the Bible. But the Bible has many stories that
recognize the importance of attachment, including the one we read today, from
Genesis.
God says,
after creating this human person, Adam, that it wasn’t good for Adam to be
alone—unattached, so to speak. So what does God do? Well, he brings all the
animals of creation to Adam. Maybe, thinks God, one of the animals will help
Adam with his loneliness. But, says the writer of Genesis, none of the animals
turns out to be a suitable helper for Adam. Adam was still alone.
So next,
according to the story--a lovely, true myth, actually--God puts Adam to sleep, takes out one of Adam’s ribs,
makes a woman out it, and brings her to Adam. Maybe the woman can help Adam
with his loneliness.
And what
does Adam say when he sees Eve? Well, listen. He says this woman is, “bone of
my bone and flesh of my flesh.” He immediately feels completely and absolutely
attached to her. In fact, Adam and Eve are so tight with each other, so into each
other that it is as if the two of them share the same body. That is why the
writer of Genesis says that when a man leaves his father and mother, he is
“united,” to his partner, and they become one flesh—words that are used several
times in the New Testament to describe marriage.
Now here is
an important truth behind all this Biblical language about attachment. Humans
have evolved to need other humans.
Consider children. They are
born absolutely helpless. When my youngest son
David was born, at home, I saw, first hand, how quickly he embraced his mother. Having spent nine months in her womb he seemed, in those
first few moments, to reach for her with all his soul and mind--and especially
his eyes and mouth. Being outside the womb was an incredible adventure for him,
but one that he could cope with only by keeping the connection with his one
safe place, his mother, physically and visually alive.
No
wonder. Babies are born absolutely dependent. For years they can't feed or
protect themselves. They can't move about and don't understand their
environment. If it is cold, they freeze. Unless they are fed, they'll starve.
Although babies don't understand any of this about themselves, their brain
comes equipped to seek whatever they need from their caregivers. In short order,
the baby extends his or her search for comfort and connection from just the
mother to a small group of people: father, siblings, perhaps a godparent or
babysitter.
One
more example of attachment. We’ve all also seen this need in young
children, too. Imagine a little girl exploring a slide on the playground, for
example. Dad is sitting on a bench a few yards away. The little girl, even
after successfully negotiating the slide once, with dad's help, constantly
keeps an eye on dad to make sure that he remains close and available in case of
trouble. The little girl wants to make sure dad is available to her, and feels
more comfortable—more adventurous, even—so long as she knows his protective
embrace is just a step away.
When babies or children don’t get
that loving, emotionally rich bond—when parents are absent due to neglect, or
an accident, or terrible long-term illness—many, many studies have shown that
children often suffer lifelong consequences. They may become apathetic or have
behavioral problems. Such children have a harder time connecting to others as
adults, and with being empathetic.
As humans, we never lose this
need to be attached to others. When we lose someone we’re attached to it is a
tragedy and we’re injured. Think, for example, of Jesus on the cross. One of
the saddest aspects of that death were the words he screamed out to his father, his abba, just before he
died: "My God, my God, why have you abandoned me?" Jesus' loss of his attachment to
God was at the heart of his suffering. But we all have Adam’s need and Jesus’
need: for attachment, for people who will be safe harbors for us, for people who
will have our backs no matter what, for people who, in the swift and raging river
of time, will for us immoveable, dependable rocks we can safely stand on.
And a
couple’s relationship, at its best, thrives to the degree that this sort of
deep, emotional, attachment is real and dependable.
By the way,
there is a great book on attachment I’m going to suggest that all of you who
are in a committed relationship buy. It’s a bestseller called Hold Me Tight, by Canadian therapist Sue
Johnson. Hold Me Tight is easily the
most readable and best book on attachment available.
But now, having
explained, in a few words, the biological and spiritual basis of attachment, I
need, finally, to get back to the question I started with. Get married or move
in?
Well, first,
don’t forget that according to the story of Adam and Eve, they were deeply
attached without a wedding—though I am not sure who they would have invited,
should they have wanted one! But actually, what is true for Adam and Eve is
mostly true all through the Bible. While we know that people were married
because the Bible describes people as husbands and wives—we know just about
nothing about how people became married. Jesus went to a wedding reception
where there wasn’t enough wine, but what happened at the wedding ceremony itself
isn’t known. Maybe, back then, they just moved in with each other. At some
periods of Israel’s life, this was almost certainly how it was done. What I
mean to say is that the Bible doesn’t prescribe that church weddings or civil
registrations are how marriages have to be done. It is the idea of marriage or
union that matters, not how it comes to be.
Second, if
you are looking at a life partnership, making a promise to your partner that
the partnership is exclusive, that it is for life, that it is
unconditional—making such promises are good for attachment. Making promises
cultivated deeper attachment. And of course, promises are what make a marriage
ceremony a marriage ceremony.
Two people
could do their wedding on a beach instead of a church; they could do their
wedding dressed in bathing trunks rather than tuxes and gowns; they could do
the wedding during lunchtime at work rather than at two o’clock on Saturday—as
long as those two people make their promises to each other, it is a wedding.
So while I’d
never say that living together is wrong—I’d add that making promises is
beautiful, and great strategy for nurturing attachment.
Of course,
you could make those promises in private, and many people do. There is nothing
wrong with that. But making promises in public increases the weight and
visibility of the promise. Making promises in public holds you accountable to
the whole community of your family and friends for keeping those promises. And,
making promises in public also offers, both before and after, a great
opportunity to celebrate those attachment promises with friends and family.
Finally,
beware of one danger of “just” moving in. Moving in without promises—whether
public or private—moving in without making a commitment to each other, moving
in to see if it will work—all these things make it much more likely that you
will be moving in for just a little while. Recent research, reported on in the
NYT for example, makes it abundantly clear that when two people drift into a
live-in relationship—because it's cheaper, because they are staying over more
often—when two people drift into a live-in relationship without the benefit of promises
their relationship is less likely to last and less likely to develop strong
attachment than a live-in relationship or marriage where the commitment that
goes with making promises is front and center.
So, get
married or move in? Both can be great. But which ever you choose, remember that
if you’re looking for long-term, loving attachment, making promises is a great
strategy.
A colleague once asked me if I had lived together with my husband (of 25 years) before we got married. I answered no (even though technically we had since we had both lived under my parent's roof the last 4 months before getting married...). I told her that I was not the same person after 25 years as when I had married and neither was my spouse. We had both grown and changed so much in 25 years that even if we had lived together to 'see if we were compatible', it wouldn't have been a good predictor. Instead, what was important was common values and an willingness, on both our parts, to change with and for each other, and to hold each other to standards of truth and love.
ReplyDeleteLoved your response Sandy.... "commitment" with the heart and mind in sync or better known as sincerity"....
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete