Thursday, December 15, 2011
"Not Sure" Video posted by Eerdmans
Eerdmans recently interviewed me about my new book, Not Sure: A Pastor's Journey from Faith to Doubt. I've never been able to speak off of the top of my head as well as I can write, but I do think these turned out pretty good. Check them out!
Interview with John Suk about faith and doubt
Labels:
doubt,
ethnic churches,
faith,
John Suk,
literacy
Monday, December 5, 2011
Does the Gospel Have a Short Shelf Life?
(This is a sermon I preached on the theme of "gospel," based on Isaiah 61 and Colossians 1:1-8. I asked for advice about what to say about the gospel's relevance on Facebook, and incorporated some of that into the sermon. So, I'm interested in knowing whether or not you think I got the relevance of our good news out there in this effort. And thanks for everyone who helped me think it through. John)
Have you heard the good news? Western society, as we know
it, has been saved!
In fact,
Western Society as we know it, from Apple.com to McDonalds to Wall Street was actually
saved 2500 years ago, just before the flowering of classical Greek
civilization. In the years just before Plato and Aristotle and Sophocles and
their invention of drama and philosophy and science, evil Persia was trying to
conquer Greece. But at the Battle of Marathon, the forces of Greek Athens defeated
the violent, repressive Persians and their strange ideas. Winning the war
against Persia was such good news that Philippides ran all the way from the
battlefield at Marathon to Athens, 42 kilometers, without stopping, to announce
the good news—“We won.” And then Philippides died of exhaustion.
Now, doesn’t
the Athenian victory at Marathon just make your head spin? Doesn’t it make you
want to party and dance?
Or not?
That’s the
trouble with good news, isn’t it? Good news usually has a short shelf life. For
example, one day you are single, then you meet the right guy, and you fall in
love, and pretty soon you’re engaged. Good news! So you tell all your friends
and they “Like” your announcement on Facebook and they plan a Jack and Jill
party for you. The next Sunday everyone crowds around you at church and looks
at the ring and oohs and aahs and then, just like that, it’s over. The next
Sunday no one asks you about your engagement anymore. People have moved on. Good
news has a short shelf life.
And that is
a problem for the Bible, and the story of Jesus too, don’t you think? Isaiah
says the Messiah will be anointed to preach good news to the poor, bind up the
brokenhearted, and he will proclaim freedom to the captives. Good news!
And, in
fact, that is exactly what Jesus did. Even more, he died for the sins of the
world, too. Even rose again on the third day. Paul, in our text from Colossians
is still beside himself when he talks about it, even 30 years after the
resurrection: “We always thank God,
he says, because we have heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love
you have . . . the gospel is bearing fruit and growing.”
But it is now
2000 years later. Are we still elated, with Paul? Are we so excited about the
gospel that it continues to bear fruit and grow among us, in surprising and new
and numerical ways? Do you stay excited about the gospel even when you have
tests to take, or weddings to attend, or jobs to keep? Or has the gospel of
Jesus, like the good news of Marathon, passed its “best before” date?
Besides, some
of the reasons given for being excited about having a Messiah back then just
don’t seem to resonate much in our day and age, anymore. We have OHIP and
modern medicine for healing; welfare, unemployment insurance and food banks for
the poor. We have counselors for the brokenhearted, and the church will even
pay the bill, if you use our CAP program from Shalem. On top of that, unlike
the people Isaiah was writing to, we’re not exiles in a foreign land. And
unlike the people Jesus ministered to, we’re not living under a foreign
dictatorship. Life is actually very good for most of is. So what makes the
gospel good news in the middle of our already much better than average lives?
In fact,
there are some great Biblical & theological reasons for thinking of the
gospel as good news. I was reminded of that this week, on Facebook. I put up a
post saying I was writing a sermon about how the gospel was good news, but then
added some comments to the effect that it seems like old news that doesn’t get
anyone excited. I asked my Facebook friends if they had any ideas about how to convince
people that the gospel is still good news for today.
I got lots
of suggestions. One CRC minister said that, quote, “the good news is that god
continues to move in and through us as the body of Christ as we bind up the
brokenhearted, as we share out coat with him who has none” and so on. That is,
the gospel will seem like good news if we do the wonderful but difficult things
the gospel asks of us. I thought that was a good answer, as far as it went. It
is true. But . . . is that tidy theological explanation really going to make
our teenagers, or a middle-aged long-time member bored with church going to sit
up and take notice? Will it make us dance?
Someone
else said that “how can experience of the God that we’re ultimately made to be
in relationship with be anything but good news?” Well, for those who have the
experience, great! But he is in heaven and that is a long ways away. And what
about all those people who don’t have that experience, people who are
distracted, or people who are bored by church, or people who have doubts, or
people who are depressed, or people who can’t really be bothered to study the
matter—which covers a lot of people!
Another Facebook
friend said it is all about the already and not yet . . . that is, Christ has
already risen but he has not yet returned, and we have to somehow concentrate
on what we know has happened and thus imagine how it is going to be when Jesus
returns. But then, in a moment of light-hearted honesty, he also said, “tough
stuff! That is why you get paid the big bucks. I’m sure they listen to you.”
But it is
tough stuff, because the gospel is ancient, and there just are a million and
one excuses, or reasons, or whatever for leaving this building and never coming
back because you have decided it isn’t relevant anymore, or it is just old, old
news.
So I have
to say something about why you should never leave. I have to say something in
defense of the goodness of the gospel, even after 2000 years. So here it is:
The gospel
is still good news, because even if you ignore it, even if you are distracted by
your toys or responsibilities, and even if you find church boring--the God of
the whole cosmos is really here and really did the things this book [The Bible]
said he did. Even if your life goes on without you hardly noticing it, nothing
in you, good or bad, can cancel out the overwhelming cosmic reality of a God
who wants you all for himself, who wants you so badly that he was willing to
die for you, in spite of all your hang-ups, distractions and shortcomings. None
of these things can make God, or what he did, go away.
The birth,
death, and resurrection of Jesus are all just as real as the air you breathe.
The love of God for you is far more certain, and costly for Jesus, than anything
anyone is ever going to do for you. And all the wonders of nature, the birth of
Alys (who we baptized today), the starry skies on a moonless night or the fish
that swim in Rice Lake – all these wonders are nothing compared to what God has
really done in Jesus or the fact that God wants you and I to be his love in a
broken, violent, and dangerous world.
Listen. I
know you might have to do a bit of digging around in scripture to convince
yourself. I know that you may have to look past some of the shortcomings of the
people in this church—or any church—to really get a sense of the power of it. I
know that you may have lots of reasons to prefer being distracted than applying
yourself to considering what I have said. But I also know that none of this
makes it any less true that God loves us fiercely. He wants your knee to bow
and your tongue to confess along with every other knee and tongue in creation.
And he wants it so bad that even though he was God, he became human to convince
us, and died on a cross to make it so.
That birth
and death was a long time ago. Like the Battle of Marathon. But the love? The
eternal hope? The life he has given you to live in love? The adventure of it
all? That is for today. Like Isaiah says, “Now
is the year of the Lord’s favor.” And like Jesus says, when he quotes our
passage from Isaiah. “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” Good
news.
Monday, November 21, 2011
The Idiot Box
My wife and I do not own a television. We never had. Judging
by the reviews of this year’s TV season, so far, we’re not missing much.
However, our refusal not to purchase a television isn’t
really related to our dislike for what’s on television. My pet reason for not
having a television is that many scholars suspect that watching even a small
amount of television detracts from the ability to read well. Repeated exposure
to TV develops the synapses and neural pathways in the brain that decode
television; but this brain development seems strongly correlated to lack of
development in the reading center of the brain. For Christians, who are people
of the Word—undermining the ability to read well and deeply is a spiritual
issue.
Even Camille Paglia, a famous culture critic best known for
celebrating television’s role in the “repaganization of Western Culture,” understands
how television is dangerous in this respect. She writes that in the second
command God forbade the use of all images in heaven above and earth below
because God understood that such images create a powerful, spiritual urge to
ignore words. So Paglia calls for “the enlightened repression of our children,”
by which she means rigorous word-centered education to the exclusion of TV, if
we want our kids to become all they can be. Commenting on this insight, Neil
Postman said, “With the Second Commandment, Moses was the first person who ever
said, more or less, “Don’t watch TV; go do your homework.”
So what about your TV watching habits? I have a few
suggestions. First, inform yourself about the State of the discussion when it
comes to the benefits and risks of TV viewing, especially for children. I’d
recommend Maryanne Wolf’s Proust and the
Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain, and Mark Bauerlein's The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age
Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future. In my book, Not Sure, you can find a long
bibliography on the relation of television to reading on page 42.
Second. Make reading together a family-time priority until
well after the kids are reading on their own, a lot, with pleasure. As an added
benefit, you’ll double and triple your cuddle time. My wife and I took turns
reading to our children for an hour a day until the oldest was well into high
school. That daily hour is easily one of our kids’ best memories of growing up.
Third. Don’t ever allow the television to play when a parent
isn’t watching along. Children of all ages need instruction and wisdom about
what they see on television because television mostly portrays a fanciful world
without God where greed, envy, and several more of the deadly sins carry the
day. That’s a very jaundiced view of how things really are; kids need another
perspective to interpret TV for them.
Finally, if you don’t have time or energy for the above—and
I take it that includes a lot of this blog's readers—I have one final
suggestion. It cuts through all the difficulties that go with having a
television. Get rid of it.
Our family fell into life without a television when I was in
seminary and couldn’t afford cable, much less the television itself. Somehow
that circumstance has become a blessing that continues to give and give. Over
the years we’ve avoided countless hours of uncommunicative stupefaction and had
discussions, reading, and lots of other fun activities instead.
The bottom line here is that all the time and energy it
takes to watch television responsibly may simply be out of reach for most of
us. On the other hand, all those extra hours without a television could provide
a rich, rich resource for raising kids in the way they should go. All for the
price of a trip to the trash can.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
News About Not Sure, Upcoming Events
Bob Cornwall, a Disciples of Christ pastor, Fuller Grad, and church historian from Troy, Michigan, has written a review of my book, Not Sure: A Pastor's Journey from Faith to Doubt on his blog. Very thoughtful. Check it out at http://pastorbobcornwall.blogspot.com/2011/11/not-sure-by-john-suk-review.html
I have two upcoming events, one in Grand Rapids, and the other in Sarnia, Ontario!
I'll be talking about my book at Eerdmans in Grand Rapids, this Thursday at 7 pm. They are located at 2140 Oak Industrial Dr., NE. We expect a great crowd.
The next day I'll be in Sarnia, Ontario, giving a talk and signing books at The Green Room, DeGroot's Nursery, London Rd., at 8 pm. There will be goodies, too!
I'd love to see many old friends and acquaintances at these two events. Come on out!
Monday, November 7, 2011
Let's Take Christ Out of Christmas
I say, let’s take Christ out of Christmas. It would solve a
big problem for us religious types.
The
problem, of course, is the commercialization of Christmas. Sometime between Canadian
Thanksgiving and American Thanksgiving, say in mid-November, the Christmas
season begins in earnest. North Americans make pilgrimage to their malls to
shop and to see Santa and his little helpers in their crimson miniskirts. None
of us is very surprised when our little kids ask if the wise men came to
Bethlehem in a sleigh pulled by Rudolph.
The bottom
line is that even though we all dutifully tip our hats to the real meaning of
Christmas, all of us know that Christ comes in a poor second to parties and
decorations, gift giving and receiving, shopping and credit card exhaustion.
So, I say
let’s turn the other cheek. Instead of letting modern culture squeeze Christ
out of Christmas, Christians should just volunteer to take Christ out of
Christmas, and pick another day to celebrate his birth. December 25 was always
a sort of suspicious date, anyway. It was the Roman Emperor Constantine
(312-337) who chose December 25 for Christmas, since nobody knew when Jesus was
really born. But he chose that date because he wanted to replace the pagan
celebration of the winter solstice, the day on which the sun is “reborn,” with
a holy day celebrating another birth. The Romans may have been okay with giving
up paganism, but they didn’t want to give up the partying.
But now so
little is left of Christ in Christmas that I don’t think anyone would notice if
Christians moved the celebration of his birth to some other date. December 25
could then be officially renamed “Xmas.” Just think of the advantages. Christians
wouldn’t be faced with the difficult task of keeping the real meaning of
Christmas alive for our children anymore. We wouldn’t have to hassle with
conflicts between Sunday School Christmas programs and office Xmas parties. We
could open presents on Xmas morning without feeling like we are shortchanging
the memory of Jesus’ birth into a life of rejection and suffering. We wouldn’t
have to explain how Christmas joy is about a lamb being born to the slaughter
rather than about eating as much turkey as we want.
A
less-hyped Christmas would also help us properly stress the celebration that is
the real heart of the Christian calendar, Easter. That is, assuming we can hold
the line against the Easter bunny and chocolate egg hunts.
Let’s move
Christmas to another day. I think Jesus would approve. It doesn’t much matter
what new date we choose for the real Christmas. I’m thinking June 25 might
work. You see, my wife’s birthday is December 25, and I’ve already figured out
that by honoring her birthday with a gift on June 25, her birthday doesn’t get
lost with everything else on Xmas Day.
And in the
end, isn’t that what we want for Jesus too? That he doesn’t get lost?
Friday, October 28, 2011
My Wallet
Just over forty years ago my grandfather, Arend
Schuil--Opa, as we used to call him—put on a heavy apron, picked up his sheers,
and cut into a piece of rawhide. He knew what he was doing, since he had spent
his life cutting leather to make the special orthopedic shoes he sold to
customers all over the Netherlands. But now that he was retired, the shoe molds
and rubber soles that used to fill his shop were long gone. Instead of leather
uppers, this time he cut the leather to make wallets for his grandchildren. I
received mine, my last gift from him, in 1967.
I still have that wallet in a
drawer of my desk. I keep special papers in it. Opa sewed it together using
tiny, perfectly symmetrical, stitches. Even now, the leather is soft and
supple—the softest thing I own.
I only met him twice, for a few
weeks each time, on his rare visits to Canada. He taught me to play chess on
long summer afternoons under a shade tree beside our house. We didn’t talk
much, since my Dutch was poor and his English non-existent. Still, it never
felt awkward. Quiet with him was restful, relaxed and happy.
Genealogy is my hobby, so by
studying old church and civil documents in the Netherlands, I’ve learned that
my Opa’s ancestors had been making shoes in the Dutch province of Groningen for
the better part of three hundred years. But now my wallet is the only tangible
link I have left to all those centuries of toil.
I’ve also learned that some
Schuils wanted more out of life than making shoes. Among my great- and
great-great grandparents there was one who helped buy a new house for the local
preacher. Others were volunteer organists and choir directors. My grandfather
would have loved to become a preacher himself.
But back then most people didn’t
have a choice about what they would do with their lives. Formal education was a
luxury. Most people did what their fathers did; you took up the business and learned
as unpaid child labor. And that was if your family had a trade. My grandfather on
the Suk side had to quit school to work the potato fields as a day laborer by the
time he was eleven or twelve. His father peddled groceries door to door out of
a dog cart. They got by, but sometimes only barely.
And my wallet reminds me of all
that. My wallet is like a hinge, really. It connects me—with all my
opportunities, choice, and postgraduate education—to an era in the very recent
past when what you did with your life, workwise, wasn’t a unique “calling” you had
the luxury of making a decision about. No, in those days, people didn’t have
“callings.” They had “tellings,” and did as told, workwise, whether they wanted
to or not.
That wallet reminds me that
having the opportunity to go to school, and choose a career is a big privilege.
Thinking back on my family history, my hope is that my grandkids will
understand just how great a privilege that choice is. Of course, they’ll have
to study hard borrow money and work hard to make their dreams come to pass—but
I’ll urge them to do so.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
A Wretch Like Me
I just paid a big speeding ticket in New York State. The officer pulled me over at the Gananoque bridge, wrote a ticket, smiled and left. He was pulling over people at a sneeky speed-trap where drivers have to slam on their brakes to slow from 65 to 40. This officer never gave me an opportunity to argue my case. The bill arrived in the mail two weeks later. I felt wretched—the dollar damage was more than I dare admit in public.
This reminded me of a speeding ticket that I talked my way out of, a few years ago. One Sunday, when Irene and I lived in Manila, The Philippines, we were on our way to a lunch engagement on the other side of town, after church.
Unfortunately, on Makati Avenue I ran an amber light that turned red by the time I was through. A guy in a funny yellow t-shirt tried to wave me down. Without thinking I swerved round him and continued on. I said to Irene that he looked an awful lot like a street-sweeper. But deep inside I suspected he might be a policeman. Like an idiot I made a few unscheduled turns in the hope of losing him. Soon I was stuck in traffic.
Unfortunately, my intuition was rewarded when my yellow-shirted policeman on a 100 cc scooter pulled up beside me, easily weaving in and out of the cars that surrounded me. He motioned for me to roll down my window.
I told him I mistook him for a street cleaner. This did not impress him. He asked me to hand over my license. I refused, knowing that he could demand a huge bribe if I asked for it back. So I said the law did not require me to ever hand over my license, even to a policeman. This was true, but made him angry. He suggested we ride over to the police station to resolve matters. I asked him if there was anyway we could avoid the trip and settle matters now. I was hoping he would just write me a ticket. He looked up at me with narrowed eyes and asked “what do you mean?” He was hoping for a bribe.
I suddenly remembered how, years ago, a Nigerian driver I was with had refused to pay a bribe to a teen-aged soldier who just happened to be waving a machine gun through our car window, roughly in my direction. “Christians don’t pay bribes,” my driver said. The soldier scowled and let us through the roadblock. Inspired by the memory, instead of offering a bribe, I said, “Please officer, forgive me.”
The Manila policeman was even less impressed than the Nigerian soldier had been. I forged ahead with the him anyway. “Sir, forgive me. I did wrong. Kasalanan ko. It is my fault. Will you please forgive me? I will not ever go through a red light again. I have learned my lesson. Sir, please forgive.” All in one breath.
Ask and you will receive, says scripture. I’ve never heard a sermon that tried to explain those words as literally true, and strictly speaking, they didn’t apply in this situation anyway. All the same, they came to me as the police officer told me that if he ever saw me go through a red light again, he would throw the book at me. Then, shaking his head, he got back on his bike and left.
I’m not sure what went through his head. Was he sad to have missed out on a bribe? Did he figure a day in the police station, arguing about fines, would cut into his opportunity to extract bribes from other, more willing, traffic violators? Was he utterly amazed by my non-Filipino willingness to lose face by admitting guilt and begging for forgiveness? Or perhaps I just misread the situation from the start, and he wasn’t looking for a bribe at all. Maybe, he was just a gracious person.
I’ll never know, for sure. But I guess a wretch like me was saved!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)