I
was invited to speak to a seminary class at Emmanuel College at the UofT a few weeks ago,
on the theme, “Entrepreneurship in Ministry.” It was fun. The students asked
good questions. Just before I was ready to go, I shared this list of “ten true
statements” that ministers need to keep in mind, these days—and parishioners,
too, if they have any interest in the future health of their congregations. So,
here goes:
One: Being
a minister, here and now, is perhaps not
harder than ever before. We are not being persecuted for our faith, after all.
And we’re not laying it all on the line like the Reformers did.
Still,
being a minister now is really, really challenging, because the playing field
is changing incredibly swiftly. The listening skills audiences bring to
preaching, the secrets people live with, the values of our society, the time
constraints everyone struggles to undo, the wealth we take for granted—it is
all fascinating, but it is also a minefield for both minister and parishioner.
Meanwhile
there is only one person in any congregation with the stated, paid
responsibility to lead in this situation. The minister.
Two: Ministers (or someone they can
work very closely with) must be entrepreneurial. By entrepreneurial, I mean
that church leadership must be dedicated to growth along with all the other
goals healthy churches have, from social justice to relevant preaching. This is
Biblical (if that matters a lot to you—I’m thinking the Great Commission here,
and the example of Paul’s preaching). This is also practical. Refusing to
prioritize or take smart risks for growth is to volunteer your congregation for
a short lifespan. Why do that? Toronto needs the United Church’s witness and
example!
I
have some more ideas about entrepreneurial wisdom. It is a spiritual thing, a
refusal to bury your or your congregation’s talents in the sand. Entrepreneurial
wisdom does not mean that you have chosen to fall for a “health and wealth”
gospel sort of faux Christianity that pervades the airwaves—and it better not
mean that. If ministers are not entrepreneurial themselves, they must nurture
that sort of leadership in others, and support it like crazy-which isn’t so
different from the minister who can’t play an instrument or hold a tune but who
supports the Music Director 100 percent.
Three: Faith
in entrepreneurial wisdom adds up to a refusal to be a church “decline
theorist.” Decline theorists are those who say things like, “well, of course,
if we stand up for what we believe in, we’re not going to be popular and of
course we might die.” Even if this was true, wouldn’t you look for ways to work
a little resurrection into that equation?
Four: Many churches have hidden resources. Some churches can mortgage their property, for example, to make an investment in
ministry geared to church growth. Why not? If you don’t invest, you won’t
change, and your slow decline will accelerate, and you will close. Once you are closed, the church's resources cannot be used by that congregation anymore. Why not access those resources, if possible, before you close? Some city churches might be able to sell their buildings and relaunch in rental space, or some other kind of shared arrangement. If your program succeeds,
great!
A
mortgage isn’t the only alternative resource. Not all these resources are available to everyone, but spend some time doing research. The United Church has grant
programs. Volunteers may do work that is often paid--from janitorial to accounting to pastoral to youth to babysitting. Some people in your congregation may have deep pockets. The
government offers grants for summer job programs. Rent your facilities. Consider amalgamation. Seminary students may do great work for less cost. Don't presume that everyone has considered every option till you've called a meeting of the congregation with the express purpose of thinking outside of the box.
Five: A church made up almost entirely of
elderly people (let’s call them “Boomers,”) can survive indefinitely if it
brings in a steady stream of new elderly people to replace the ones who die. I’m
not being facetious. A sixty-year-old person can easily contribute twenty or
more years of his or her life to church community. Church community is great
for elderly people. They key is to grasp this as an opportunity if it is the
one that works for your church, and then intentionally pursue it.
Six: One of the largest costs of doing
“business,” in the UCC in Toronto and other large Canadian cities is
ministerial wages. Many Evangelical groups don’t have these high costs because
they pay less. That means they need fewer resources to launch new churches in
promising city neighbourhoods, or they can divert more resources to outreach. Many
Evangelical ministers are happy to engage in tent-making ministries, to earn
lower wages because of spousal support, even to work for nothing until a church
grows to the point that it can support them. They do so because they believe in
what they are doing. I’m not sure what to make of this. Should we pay less? Is
a fair wage worth a church’s dying for? Can we promote tent-making as an
option? Or, are we just to old, to set in our ways, too tight with our
privilege to respond to innovations happening elsewhere in Christianity?
Seven: If you are going through a
mid-life crisis and want to (and can afford to) find yourself spiritually by
going to seminary, great. But the ministry is not a place for people looking to
find themselves; it is a place for growing, nurturing churches that can make a
difference in the city and country by offering those churches leadership,
vision, encouragement, and wisdom. It is for building Christ-like communities
so compelling that people see God in them, even from a distance. This is hard
work for people who know who they are and what they want, not for people who
see their primary goal in life as remaining a pilgrim.
Eight: Beware
of guilting. We love social justice. We live for the least, the last, the
marginalized. But if we get into the pulpit and make it a steady stream of “you
must,” “do this,” “get on with it!” you will drive your parishioners to
spiritual depression. Don’t forget to speak of other things from the pulpit, of
gratitude, and grace. Don’t just crack the whip, but offer perspective, teach
the story, laugh, and poke fun at yourself. Guilt is what we as Christians are
supposed to get rid of, not cultivate.
Nine:
Do not, for a moment, underestimate the value, importance, absolute necessity
of great preaching. It is harder than ever to hold an audience’s attention. To
do so, one must become a student of narrative, an astute observer of how
contemporary media works (and doesn’t), and one must be willing to spend a lot
of time crafting something that will surprise and delight—at least on a regular
basis! Boring people is a sin.
Ten: Minsters must have sincere and
enduring affection for everyone who comes to worship. That affection needs to
be worn on the shirt-sleeve. If, on the other hand, you suggest, as a minister
(or even as a parishioner) that “I’m not really that interested in you,” or, “I
don’t like you,” or, “you are not making the grade,” they will leave. It is by
our love for one another that people see Jesus—but it is also a huge motivation
to belong. And the congregation will always look to the minister to see how it
is done. That also means, by the way, that in the church the minister—and the
rest of the leadership—needs to be the first to say, “I’m sorry.” Such powerful
words, those. But entrepreneurial too, because they advertise a community that
is not only relevant and interesting and engaged—but a community that is safe.
Eight Social justice is about finding a path for yourself to make a difference, guilt has no value. Do you preach about how we all have white privilege or do you help people discover their own privilege and how it might impact others ? These days reading land acknowledgement is guilt, using land acknowledgement to learn about Indigenous culture, or spirituality or what you personally can do to advocate is what is needed. "We are gathered here on these lands to be together in a good way"
ReplyDeleteEntrepreneurs fail 9 out of 10 times. Playing it safe, no risk , looking for proof of what has been done already is a guarantee to maintaining the status quo. Trillium Foundation realized that a few years ago in their new strategy, without risk they just kept funding the same thing again and again. We need a culture that welcomes and tolerates risk with one proviso, there must be learning.
ReplyDeleteThanks for these comments, John. There are ways to inspire social justice action without resorting to guilt. And accepting risk is crucial. Not accepting risk also results in failure, after all, maybe even more often than 9 times out of ten. And remember--you don't have to bet the whole house every time you take a risk!
DeleteJohn, you might want to consider intrapreneurship - disruption from within - rather than entrepreneurship -starting up a new venture - as a model we need to cultivate. There are lots of examples of intrapreneurship in the public and social sectors, not as easy to find for the church sector. (E.g., https://books.google.com/books?id=S_ZOCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA183&lpg=PA183&dq=church+intrapreneurship&source=bl&ots=IVI1Mh3Ezc&sig=F8L5Dk1mDEoEY7SXSoB1njRIG2Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz-sD31IXaAhUnwlQKHR9kC8kQ6AEIdDAJ#v=onepage&q=church%20intrapreneurship&f=false)
ReplyDelete